LineageOS/android_external_libcxx
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[libcxx] [test] Change comments to say C++ instead of c++. NFC.

Browse Source 
This makes them consistent (many comments already used uppercase).

The special REQUIRES, UNSUPPORTED, and XFAIL comments are excluded from this change.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@309468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Stephan T. Lavavej
2017-07-29 00:55:35 +00:00
parent cf230766ee
commit 5d91f314f1
34 changed files with 36 additions and 36 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp
View File

@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete, c++98, c++03, c++11
// NOTE: Clang does not enable sized-deallocation in c++14 and beyond by
// NOTE: Clang does not enable sized-deallocation in C++14 and beyond by
// default. It is only enabled when -fsized-deallocation is given.
// (except clang-3.6 which temporarily enabled sized-deallocation)
// UNSUPPORTED: clang, apple-clang
// NOTE: GCC 4.9.1 does not support sized-deallocation in c++14. However
// NOTE: GCC 4.9.1 does not support sized-deallocation in C++14. However
// GCC 5.1 does.
// XFAIL: gcc-4.7, gcc-4.8, gcc-4.9

4
test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete14.pass.cpp
View File

@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete, c++98, c++03, c++11
// NOTE: Clang does not enable sized-deallocation in c++14 and beyond by
// NOTE: Clang does not enable sized-deallocation in C++14 and beyond by
// default. It is only enabled when -fsized-deallocation is given.
// (except clang-3.6 which temporarily enabled sized-deallocation)
// UNSUPPORTED: clang, apple-clang
// NOTE: GCC 4.9.1 does not support sized-deallocation in c++14. However
// NOTE: GCC 4.9.1 does not support sized-deallocation in C++14. However
// GCC 5.1 does.
// XFAIL: gcc-4.7, gcc-4.8, gcc-4.9

2
test/std/language.support/support.types/nullptr_t.pass.cpp
View File

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int main()
{
#ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_NULLPTR
static_assert(!has_less<std::nullptr_t>::value, "");
// FIXME: our c++03 nullptr emulation still allows for comparisons
// FIXME: our C++03 nullptr emulation still allows for comparisons
// with other pointer types by way of the conversion operator.
//static_assert(!has_less<void*>::value, "");
#else