Change sleep_for, sleep_until, and the condition_variable timed wait

functions to protect against duration and time_point overflow.  Since
we're about to wait anyway, we can afford to spend a few more cycles on
this checking.  I purposefully did not treat the timed try_locks with
overflow checking.  This fixes
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13721 .  I'm unsure if the standard
needs clarification in this area, or if this is simply QOI.  The
<chrono> facilities were never intended to overflow check, but just to
not overflow if durations stayed within +/- 292 years.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@162925 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Howard Hinnant
2012-08-30 19:14:33 +00:00
parent c417a802ed
commit cf115d2cc6
4 changed files with 53 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@@ -323,11 +323,6 @@ public:
template <class _Predicate>
void wait(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk, _Predicate __pred);
template <class _Duration>
cv_status
wait_until(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
const chrono::time_point<chrono::system_clock, _Duration>& __t);
template <class _Clock, class _Duration>
cv_status
wait_until(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
@@ -382,28 +377,13 @@ condition_variable::wait(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk, _Predicate __pred)
wait(__lk);
}
template <class _Duration>
cv_status
condition_variable::wait_until(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
const chrono::time_point<chrono::system_clock, _Duration>& __t)
{
using namespace chrono;
typedef time_point<system_clock, nanoseconds> __nano_sys_tmpt;
__do_timed_wait(__lk,
__nano_sys_tmpt(__ceil<nanoseconds>(__t.time_since_epoch())));
return system_clock::now() < __t ? cv_status::no_timeout :
cv_status::timeout;
}
template <class _Clock, class _Duration>
cv_status
condition_variable::wait_until(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
const chrono::time_point<_Clock, _Duration>& __t)
{
using namespace chrono;
system_clock::time_point __s_now = system_clock::now();
typename _Clock::time_point __c_now = _Clock::now();
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __s_now + __ceil<nanoseconds>(__t - __c_now));
wait_for(__lk, __t - _Clock::now());
return _Clock::now() < __t ? cv_status::no_timeout : cv_status::timeout;
}
@@ -427,9 +407,17 @@ condition_variable::wait_for(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
const chrono::duration<_Rep, _Period>& __d)
{
using namespace chrono;
if (__d <= __d.zero())
return cv_status::timeout;
typedef time_point<system_clock, duration<long double, nano> > __sys_tpf;
typedef time_point<system_clock, nanoseconds> __sys_tpi;
__sys_tpf _Max = __sys_tpi::max();
system_clock::time_point __s_now = system_clock::now();
steady_clock::time_point __c_now = steady_clock::now();
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __s_now + __ceil<nanoseconds>(__d));
if (_Max - __d > __s_now)
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __s_now + __ceil<nanoseconds>(__d));
else
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __sys_tpi::max());
return steady_clock::now() - __c_now < __d ? cv_status::no_timeout :
cv_status::timeout;
}