Swap two lines in __mutex_base. On systems with high clock rates, we could mistakenly return no_timeout when a mutex had timed out if we got a tick between these two lines. Thanks to Brian Cain for the bug report.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291492 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -410,8 +410,8 @@ condition_variable::wait_for(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
|
|||||||
typedef time_point<system_clock, duration<long double, nano> > __sys_tpf;
|
typedef time_point<system_clock, duration<long double, nano> > __sys_tpf;
|
||||||
typedef time_point<system_clock, nanoseconds> __sys_tpi;
|
typedef time_point<system_clock, nanoseconds> __sys_tpi;
|
||||||
__sys_tpf _Max = __sys_tpi::max();
|
__sys_tpf _Max = __sys_tpi::max();
|
||||||
system_clock::time_point __s_now = system_clock::now();
|
|
||||||
steady_clock::time_point __c_now = steady_clock::now();
|
steady_clock::time_point __c_now = steady_clock::now();
|
||||||
|
system_clock::time_point __s_now = system_clock::now();
|
||||||
if (_Max - __d > __s_now)
|
if (_Max - __d > __s_now)
|
||||||
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __s_now + __ceil<nanoseconds>(__d));
|
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __s_now + __ceil<nanoseconds>(__d));
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user