Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336866 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It was defined with the right visibility, but declared without any visibility.
This function was left out of a prior revision that did the same to several
functions in <compare> (r336665) because the compiler I used didn't support
coroutines. This reinforces the need for automated checks -- there might
still be several cases of this throughout the library.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: modocache, christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49145
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Many operators in <compare> were _defined_ with the proper visibility attribute,
but they were _declared_ without any. This is not a problem until we change the
definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to something that requires the
declaration to be decorated.
I also marked `strong_equality::operator weak_equality()` as
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`, since it seems like it had been forgotten.
This came up while trying to get rid of `__attribute__((__always_inline__))`
in favor of `__attribute__((internal_linkage))`.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49104
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336665 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336382 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336369 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It is part of the synopsis in the Standard and <utility> does include it,
but it was left out of the synopsis comment.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48611
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336368 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: This is needed to implement `<charconv>`, otherwise `<charconv>` would need to include `<system_error>`, which pulls in `<string>` -- a header which the `<charconv>` proposal intends to keep away from.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41347
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336164 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
_is_chartype_l (needed for isxdigit_l) in MinGW compares locale_t and NULL.
NULL is 'long long' for 64-bit, and this results in ambiguous overloads when
compiled with Clang. Define a concrete overload for the operators to fix the
ambiguity.
Reviewers: mstorsjo, EricWF, srhines, danalbert
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48749
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336141 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r334477 renamed the cxx-headers target to cxx_headers, but various
pieces sort-of expect the target names to match the component (e.g.,
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS in the various bootstrap caches, which, via
some magic foreign to me, seems to expect cxx-headers,
install-cxx-headers, and install-cxx-headers-stripped to exist.)
Revert back to cxx-headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48701
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@335899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change adds a support for multiarch style runtimes layout, so in
addition to the existing layout where runtimes get installed to:
lib/clang/$version/lib/$os
Clang now allows runtimes to be installed to:
lib/clang/$version/$target/lib
This also includes libc++, libc++abi and libunwind; today those are
assumed to be in Clang library directory built for host, with the
new layout it is possible to install libc++, libc++abi and libunwind
into the runtime directory built for different targets.
The use of new layout is enabled by setting the
LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIME_TARGET_DIR CMake variable and is supported by both
projects and runtimes layouts. The runtimes CMake build has been further
modified to use the new layout when building runtimes for multiple
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45604
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@335809 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Using file(COPY FILE...) has several downsides. Since the file command
is only executed at configuration time, any changes to headers made
after the initial CMake execution are ignored. This can lead to subtle
errors since the just built Clang will be using stale libc++ headers.
Furthermore, since the headers are copied prior to executing the build
system, this may hide missing dependencies on libc++ from other LLVM
components.
This changes replaces the use of file(COPY FILE...) command with a
custom command and target which addresses all aforementioned issues and
matches the implementation already used by other LLVM components that
also install headers like Clang builtin headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44773
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@334468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
`__user_alloc_construct_impl` is used by <experimental/memory_resource>, but
this `__user_alloc_construct` is never used.
Also, `<experimental/memory_resource>` doesn't need a full definition of
`std::tuple`; just the forward declaration in `<__tuple>` will suffice.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D46806
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@334069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C++2a[container.requirements.general]p8 states that when move constructing
a container, the allocator is move constructed. Vector previously copy
constructed these allocators. This patch fixes that bug.
Additionally it cleans up some unnecessary allocator conversions
when copy constructing containers. Libc++ uses
__internal_allocator_traits::select_on_copy_construction to select
the correct allocator during copy construction, but it unnecessarily
converted the resulting allocator to the user specified allocator
type and back. After this patch list and forward_list no longer
do that.
Technically we're supposed to be using allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_copy_construction,
but that should seemingly be addressed as a separate patch, if at all.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@334053 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These containers type-punned between pair<K, V> and pair<const K, V> as an
optimization. This commit instead provides access to the pair via a pair of
references that assign through to the underlying object. It's still undefined to
mutate a const object, but clang doesn't optimize on this for data members, so
this should be safe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47607
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@333948 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
C++11 onwards specs the non-member functions atomic_load and atomic_load_explicit as taking the atomic<T> by const (potentially volatile) pointer. C11, in its infinite wisdom, decided to drop the const, and C17 will fix this with DR459 (the current draft forgot to fix B.16, but that’s not the normative part).
This patch fixes the libc++ version of the __c11_atomic_load builtins defined for GCC's compatibility sake.
D47618 takes care of the clang side.
Discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-May/058129.html
<rdar://problem/27426936>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47613
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@333776 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
In the TS, `uses_allocator` construction for `pair` tried to use an allocator
type of `memory_resource*`, which is incorrect because `memory_resource*` is
not an allocator type. LWG 2969 fixed it to use `polymorphic_allocator` as the
allocator type instead.
https://wg21.link/lwg2969
(D47090 included this in `<memory_resource>`; at Eric's request, I've split
this out into its own patch applied to the existing
`<experimental/memory_resource>` instead.)
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D47109
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@333384 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
That's r333325, as well as follow-up "Fix GCC handling of ATOMIC_VAR_INIT"
r333327.
Marshall asked to revert:
Let's have a discussion about how to implement this so that it is more friendly
to people with installed code bases. We've had *extremely* loud responses to
unilaterally adding warnings - especially ones that can't be easily disabled -
to the libc++ code base in the past.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@333351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The atomic non-member functions accept pointers to std::atomic / std::atomic_flag as well as to the non-atomic value. These are all dereferenced unconditionally when lowered, and therefore will fault if null. It's a tiny gotcha for new users, especially when they pass in NULL as expected value (instead of passing a pointer to a NULL value). We can therefore use the nonnull attribute to denote that:
- A warning should be generated if the argument is null
- It is undefined behavior if the argument is null (because a dereference will segfault)
This patch adds support for this attribute for clang and GCC, and sticks to the subset of the syntax both supports. In particular, work around this GCC oddity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60625
The attributes are documented:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
- https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nullability-attributes
I'm authoring a companion clang patch for the __c11_* and __atomic_* builtins, which currently only warn on a subset of the pointer parameters.
In all cases the check needs to be explicit and not use the empty nonnull list, because some of the overloads are for atomic<T*> and the values themselves are allowed to be null.
<rdar://problem/18473124>
Reviewers: arphaman, EricWF
Subscribers: aheejin, christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47225
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@333325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some *_l functions were not available in some versions of Bionic. This CL
checks that the NDK version supports the functions, and if not, falls back
on the corresponding functions that don't take a locale.
Patch by Tom Anderson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46558
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@332543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C11 defines `kill_dependency` as a macro in <stdatomic.h>. When you
include <atomic> after <stdatomic.h>, the macro clashes with
`std::kill_dependency` and causes multiple errors. Explicit error should
help in diagnosing those errors.
No change for working code that includes <atomic> before <stdatomic.h>.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@332413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@332040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Atomics in C and C++ are incompatible at the moment and mixing the
headers can result in confusing error messages.
Emit an error explicitly telling about the incompatibility. Introduce
the macro `__ALLOW_STDC_ATOMICS_IN_CXX__` that allows to choose in C++
between C atomics and C++ atomics.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@331379 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When using an old version of glibc, a ::isinf(double) and ::isnan(double)
function is provided, rather than just the macro required by C and C++.
Displace this function using _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD where possible.
The only remaining case where we should get the wrong return type is now
glibc + libc++ + a non-clang compiler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@331241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Be defensive against a reentrant std::function::operator=(nullptr_t), in case
the held function object has a non-trivial destructor. Destroying the function
object in-place can lead to the destructor being called twice.
Patch by Duncan P. N. Exon Smith. C++03 support by Volodymyr Sapsai.
rdar://problem/32836603
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34331
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@330885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are 3 changes:
* Renamed genertor.pass.cpp to generator.pass.cpp
* Removed nothing_to_do.pass.cpp
* Mark GCC 4.9 as UNSUPPORTED for the test files that have negative
narrowing conversion SFINAE test (see GCC PR63723).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@330655 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
