The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@347264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@347232 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A bunch of unordered containers tests call library functions but don't directly
include the corresponding header files:
- fabs() (defined in <cmath> which is not included);
- is_permutation() (defined in <algorithm> which is not included);
- next() (defined in <iterator> which is not included).
- As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54643.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@347085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was implicitly converting [1, 3] to bool, which triggers
an MSVC warning. The test should just pass `true`, which is
simpler, has the same behavior, and avoids the warning. (This
is a library test, not a compiler test, and the conversion happens
before calling `push_back`, so passing [1, 3] isn't interesting
in any way. This resembles a previous change to stop passing
`1 == 1` in the `vector<bool>` tests.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@346910 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch renames the cxx-benchmark-unittests to check-cxx-benchmarks
and converts the target to use LIT in order to make the tests run faster
and provide better output.
In particular this runs each benchmark in a suite one by one, allowing
more parallelism while ensuring output isn't garbage with multiple threads.
Additionally, it adds the CMake flag '-DLIBCXX_BENCHMARK_TEST_ARGS=<list>'
to specify what options are passed when running the benchmarks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@346888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@346764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds tests to ensure that multiset/unordered_multiset's emplace
method correctly constructs the elements without any intervening
constructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@346743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This fixes an regression when using bionic introduced in r345173.
I need to follow up and figure out what exactly is implied by
TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES and see what the correct configuration is for
bionic (new versions should have everything the tests care about,
versions that predate C11 certainly don't), but this gets the tests
back to the old behavior.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mclow.lists, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53956
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@345900 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts r345525. I'm reverting because that patch apparently caused
a regression on certain platforms (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D53994).
Since we don't fully understand the reasons for the regression, I'm
reverting until we can provide a fix we understand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@345893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The types/comparators passed to std::upper_bound and std::lower_bound
are not required to provided to provide an operator</comp(...) which
accepts the arguments in reverse order. Nor are the ranges required
to have a strict weak ordering.
However, in debug mode we attempted to check the result of a comparison
with the arguments reversed, which may not compiler.
This patch removes the use of the debug comparator for upper_bound
and lower_bound.
equal_range et al still use debug comparators when they call
__upper_bound and __lower_bound.
See llvm.org/PR39458
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@345434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@345281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@345214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@345148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test is trying to avoid saying aligned_alloc on Windows' UCRT, which does not (and can not) implement aligned_alloc. However, it's testing for c1xx, meaning clang on Windows will fail this test when using the UCRT.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@344829 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In this example, the ctor of G runs in the main thread in the expression G(), and also in the copy ctor of G() in the DECAY_COPY inside std::thread. The main thread destroys the G() instance at the semicolon, and the started thread destroys the G() after it returns. Thus there is a race between the threads on the n_alive variable.
The fix is to join with the background thread before attempting to destroy the G in the main thread.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@344820 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
