Summary:
This patch implements exception_ptr on Windows using the `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions provided by MSVC.
The `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions are defined inside the C++ standard library, `msvcprt`, which is unfortunate because it requires libc++ to link to the MSVC STL. However this doesn't seem to cause any immediate problems. However to be safe I kept all usages within the libc++ dylib so that user programs wouldn't have to link to MSVCPRT as well.
Note there are still 2 outstanding exception_ptr/nested_exception test failures.
* `current_exception.pass.cpp` needs to be rewritten for the Windows exception_ptr semantics which copy the exception every time.
* `rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp` need investigation. It hits a stack overflow, likely from recursion.
This patch also gets most of the `<future>` tests passing as well.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, compnerd, bcraig, rmaprath, majnemer, BillyONeal, STL_MSFT
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32927
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch XFAIL's a number of tests under test/libcxx when on Windows.
These failures need more investigation or patches to either Clang or libc++
but for now we don't want them to prevent the bot from going green.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@300941 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch addresses the following issues in the test suite:
1. Move "std::bad_array_length" test from std/ to libcxx/ test directory
since the feature is not a part of the standard.
2. Rename "futures.tas" test directory to "futures.task" since that is the
correct stable name.
3. Move tests for "packaged_task<T>::result_type" from std/ to libcxx/
test directory since the typedef is a libc++ extension.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271430 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch marks *most* tests for `std::promise`, `std::future` and `std::shared_future` as unsupported in C++03. These tests fail in C++03 mode because they attempt to copy a `std::future` even though it is a `MoveOnly` type. AFAIK the missing move-semantics in `std::future` is the only reason these tests fail but without move semantics these classes are useless. For example even though `std::promise::set_value` and `std::promise::set_exception(...)` work in C++03 `std::promise` is still useless because we cannot call `std::promise::get_future(...)`.
It might be possible to hack `std::move(...)` like we do for `std::unique_ptr` to make the move semantics work but I don't think it is worth the effort. Instead I think we should leave the `<future>` header as-is and mark the failing tests as `UNSUPPORTED`. I don't believe there are any users of `std::future` or `std::promise` in C++03 because they are so unusable. Therefore I am not concerned about losing test coverage and possibly breaking users. However because there are still parts of `<future>` that work in C++03 it would be wrong to `#ifdef` out the entire header.
@mclow.lists Should we take further steps to prevent the use of `std::promise`, `std::future` and `std::shared_future` in C++03?
Note: This patch also cleans up the tests and converts them to use `support/test_allocator.h` instead of a duplicate class in `test/std/futures/test_allocator.h`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: vsk, mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12135
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@246271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
