Summary:
Currently the implementation of [util.smartptr.shared.atomic] is provided only when using Clang, and not with GCC. This is a relic of not having a GCC implementation of <atomic>, even though <atomic> isn't actually used in the implementation. This patch enables support for atomic shared_ptr functions when using GCC.
Note that this is not a header only change. Previously only Clang builds of libc++.so would provide the required symbols. There is no reason for this restriction.
After this change both Clang and GCC builds should be binary compatible with each other WRT these symbols.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rmaprath, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21407
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@273076 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch extracts out all the pthread dependencies of libcxx into the
new header __threading_support. The motivation is to make it easy to
re-target libcxx into platforms that do not support pthread.
Original patch from Fulvio Esposito (fulvio.esposito@outlook.com) - D11781
Applied with tweaks - D19412
Change-Id: I301111f0075de93dd8129416e06babc195aa936b
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@268734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
After putting this question up on cfe-dev I have decided that it would be best to allow the use of `<atomic>` in C++03. Although static initialization is a concern the syntax required to get it is C++11 only. Meaning that C++11 constant static initialization cannot silently break in C++03, it will always cause a syntax error. Furthermore `ATOMIC_VAR_INIT` and `ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT` remain defined in C++03 even though they cannot be used because C++03 usages will cause better error messages.
The main change in this patch is to replace `__has_feature(cxx_atomic)`, which only returns true when C++ >= 11, to `__has_extension(c_atomic)` which returns true whenever clang supports the required atomic builtins.
This patch adds the following macros:
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_C_ATOMIC_IMP` - Defined on clang versions which provide the C `_Atomic` keyword.
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP` - Defined on GCC > 4.7. We must use the fallback atomic implementation.
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ATOMIC_HEADER` - Defined when it is not safe to include `<atomic>`.
`_LIBCPP_HAS_C_ATOMIC_IMP` and `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP` are mutually exclusive, only one should be defined. If neither is defined then `<atomic>` is not implemented and including `<atomic>` will issue an error.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jroelofs, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11555
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@245463 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In some places in libc++ we need to use the `__atomic_*` builtins. This patch adds a header that provides access to those builtins in a uniform way from within the dylib source.
If the compiler building the dylib does not support these builtins then a warning is issued.
Only relaxed loads are needed within the headers. A singe function to do these relaxed loads has been added to `<memory>`.
This patch applies the new atomic builtins to `__shared_count` and `call_once`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: majnemer, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10406
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@241532 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
section in libc++. This requires a recompiled dylib. Failure to rebuild
the dylib will result in a link-time error if and only if the functions from
[util.smartptr.shared.atomic] are used.
The implementation is not lock free. After considerable thought, I know of no
way to make the implementation lock free. Ideas welcome along that front. But
changing the ABI of shared_ptr is not on the table at this point.
The mutex used to lock these function is encapsulated by std::__sp_mut. The
only thing the client knows about std::__sp_mut is that it has a void* data
member, can't be constructed, and has lock and unlock members. Within the
binary __sp_mut is currently implemented as a pointer to a std::mutex. That can
change in the future without disturbing the ABI (as long as sizeof(__sp_mut)
remains constant.
I specifically did not make __sp_mut a spin lock as I have a pathological
distrust of spin locks. Testing on OS X reveals that the use of std::mutex in
this role is not a large performance penalty as long as the contention for the
mutex is low (more likely to get the lock than to have to wait). In the future
we can still make __sp_mut a spin lock if that is what is desired (without ABI
damage).
The dylib contains 16 __sp_mut's to be chosen based on the hash of the address
of the shared_ptr. The constant 16 is a ball-park reasonable space/time
tradeoff.
std::hash<T*> was changed to call __murmur2_or_cityhash, instead of the identity
function. I had thought we had already done this, but I was mistaken.
All of this is under #if __has_feature(cxx_atomic) even though the
implementation is not lock free, because the signatures require access to
std::memory_order, which is currently available only under
__has_feature(cxx_atomic).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@160940 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
