Attempt to make waitForIdleHandler reliable.

The current implementation of IdleableHandlerThread is based on
the assumption that MessageQueue#isIdle will return true iff the
message loop has finished processing its messages.

Unfortunately, this is incorrect: isIdle returns true iff are no
more messages waiting in the queue; thus, it will also return
true while it is processing the last message before going idle.

Instead of using idle handlers, take the simpler approach of
posting a runnable to the message loop and waiting for it to
be processed.

Test: see other CLs in this patch series
Bug: 31479480
Change-Id: Iae75781f067b762c8653a488a5e4d5ee0c789e01
This commit is contained in:
Lorenzo Colitti
2017-01-25 23:09:07 +09:00
parent ee4f8f30eb
commit 572f1a3185

View File

@@ -155,25 +155,13 @@ public class ConnectivityServiceTest extends AndroidTestCase {
/**
* Block until the given handler becomes idle, or until timeoutMs has passed.
*/
private static void waitForIdleHandler(HandlerThread handler, int timeoutMs) {
private static void waitForIdleHandler(HandlerThread handlerThread, int timeoutMs) {
final ConditionVariable cv = new ConditionVariable();
final MessageQueue queue = handler.getLooper().getQueue();
final IdleHandler idleHandler = () -> {
synchronized (queue) {
cv.open();
return false; // Remove the idleHandler.
}
};
synchronized (queue) {
if (queue.isIdle()) {
return;
}
queue.addIdleHandler(idleHandler);
}
final Handler handler = new Handler(handlerThread.getLooper());
handler.post(() -> cv.open());
if (!cv.block(timeoutMs)) {
fail("HandlerThread " + handler.getName() +
fail("HandlerThread " + handlerThread.getName() +
" did not become idle after " + timeoutMs + " ms");
queue.removeIdleHandler(idleHandler);
}
}