Test for the current behaviour of updating a network's owner UID.
The current behaviour is at least bizarre and arguably incorrect. Add a test to document the current behaviour so we can check that any changes we make to this behaviour are correct. Test: test-only change Change-Id: I345bd320eced96316d92e520f576ae06b8020d9f
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1957,6 +1957,57 @@ public class ConnectivityServiceTest {
|
||||
doNetworkCallbacksSanitizationTest(false /* sanitized */);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testOwnerUidChangeBug() throws Exception {
|
||||
// Owner UIDs are not visible without location permission.
|
||||
setupLocationPermissions(Build.VERSION_CODES.Q, true, AppOpsManager.OPSTR_FINE_LOCATION,
|
||||
Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION);
|
||||
|
||||
final NetworkCapabilities ncTemplate = new NetworkCapabilities();
|
||||
final int originalOwnerUid = Process.myUid();
|
||||
ncTemplate.setOwnerUid(originalOwnerUid);
|
||||
|
||||
mWiFiNetworkAgent = new TestNetworkAgentWrapper(TRANSPORT_WIFI, new LinkProperties(),
|
||||
ncTemplate);
|
||||
mWiFiNetworkAgent.connect(false);
|
||||
waitForIdle();
|
||||
|
||||
// Send ConnectivityService an update to the mWiFiNetworkAgent's capabilities that changes
|
||||
// its owner UID.
|
||||
NetworkCapabilities agentCapabilities = mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetworkCapabilities();
|
||||
assertEquals(originalOwnerUid, agentCapabilities.getOwnerUid());
|
||||
agentCapabilities.setOwnerUid(42);
|
||||
mWiFiNetworkAgent.setNetworkCapabilities(agentCapabilities, true);
|
||||
waitForIdle();
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that the owner UID is not updated.
|
||||
NetworkCapabilities nc = mCm.getNetworkCapabilities(mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork());
|
||||
assertEquals(originalOwnerUid, nc.getOwnerUid());
|
||||
|
||||
// Make an unrelated change to the capabilities.
|
||||
assertFalse(agentCapabilities.hasCapability(NET_CAPABILITY_NOT_CONGESTED));
|
||||
agentCapabilities.addCapability(NET_CAPABILITY_NOT_CONGESTED);
|
||||
mWiFiNetworkAgent.setNetworkCapabilities(agentCapabilities, true);
|
||||
waitForIdle();
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that both the capability change and the owner UID have been modified.
|
||||
// The owner UID is -1 because it is visible only to the UID that owns the network.
|
||||
nc = mCm.getNetworkCapabilities(mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork());
|
||||
assertEquals(-1, nc.getOwnerUid());
|
||||
assertTrue(nc.hasCapability(NET_CAPABILITY_NOT_CONGESTED));
|
||||
|
||||
// Set the owner back to originalOwnerUid, update the capabilities, and check that it is
|
||||
// visible again.
|
||||
// TODO: should this even be possible?
|
||||
agentCapabilities.setOwnerUid(originalOwnerUid);
|
||||
agentCapabilities.removeCapability(NET_CAPABILITY_NOT_CONGESTED);
|
||||
mWiFiNetworkAgent.setNetworkCapabilities(agentCapabilities, true);
|
||||
waitForIdle();
|
||||
|
||||
nc = mCm.getNetworkCapabilities(mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork());
|
||||
assertEquals(originalOwnerUid, nc.getOwnerUid());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testMultipleLingering() throws Exception {
|
||||
// This test would be flaky with the default 120ms timer: that is short enough that
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user