From aa8f8f33b566eee077f85729c1200a88228ac853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erik Kline Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:16:55 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Also treat loss of IPv6 as a loss of provisioning. Bug: 23226635 Change-Id: Icebb7d83ed5b3b796901b9f023909a02eb461941 --- core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java | 8 ++++++-- .../coretests/src/android/net/LinkPropertiesTest.java | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java b/core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java index 6bfa2a495b..1bb0fbb74a 100644 --- a/core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java +++ b/core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java @@ -119,8 +119,12 @@ public final class LinkProperties implements Parcelable { // // For one such example of this, see b/18867306. // - // TODO: Remove this special case altogether. - if (before.isIPv4Provisioned() && !after.isIPv4Provisioned()) { + // Additionally, losing IPv6 provisioning can result in TCP + // connections getting stuck until timeouts fire and other + // baffling failures. Therefore, loss of either IPv4 or IPv6 on a + // previously dualstack network is deemed a lost of provisioning. + if ((before.isIPv4Provisioned() && !after.isIPv4Provisioned()) || + (before.isIPv6Provisioned() && !after.isIPv6Provisioned())) { return ProvisioningChange.LOST_PROVISIONING; } return ProvisioningChange.STILL_PROVISIONED; diff --git a/core/tests/coretests/src/android/net/LinkPropertiesTest.java b/core/tests/coretests/src/android/net/LinkPropertiesTest.java index b6b4f4fa96..d5f632190d 100644 --- a/core/tests/coretests/src/android/net/LinkPropertiesTest.java +++ b/core/tests/coretests/src/android/net/LinkPropertiesTest.java @@ -560,10 +560,14 @@ public class LinkPropertiesTest extends TestCase { assertTrue(v46lp.isIPv6Provisioned()); assertTrue(v46lp.isProvisioned()); + assertEquals(ProvisioningChange.STILL_PROVISIONED, + LinkProperties.compareProvisioning(v4lp, v46lp)); assertEquals(ProvisioningChange.STILL_PROVISIONED, LinkProperties.compareProvisioning(v6lp, v46lp)); assertEquals(ProvisioningChange.LOST_PROVISIONING, LinkProperties.compareProvisioning(v46lp, v6lp)); + assertEquals(ProvisioningChange.LOST_PROVISIONING, + LinkProperties.compareProvisioning(v46lp, v4lp)); // Check that losing and gaining a secondary router does not change // the provisioning status.