LineageOS/android_packages_modules_Connectivity
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

adjust for newly added bpf map/prog definition fields in T+

Browse Source 
This is needed due to BpfLoader v0.18 supporting more
functionality and thus bpf code compilation by default using
larger structs than it did during S.

Bug: 218408035
Test: booted on cuttlefish, atest CtsNativeNetTestCases
OBSigned-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Change-Id: I0a37e59760fb0b55e6d6a6d12d5fd40106accd55
This commit is contained in:
Maciej Żenczykowski
2022-06-17 04:44:33 -07:00
parent cae181d777
commit b95db28080
1 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
tests/cts/net/native/src/BpfCompatTest.cpp
View File

@@ -31,8 +31,13 @@ void doBpfStructSizeTest(const char *elfPath) {
std::ifstream elfFile(elfPath, std::ios::in | std::ios::binary);
ASSERT_TRUE(elfFile.is_open());
EXPECT_EQ(48, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_map_def", elfFile, 0));
EXPECT_EQ(28, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_prog_def", elfFile, 0));
if (android::modules::sdklevel::IsAtLeastT()) {
EXPECT_EQ(116, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_map_def", elfFile, 0));
EXPECT_EQ(92, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_prog_def", elfFile, 0));
} else {
EXPECT_EQ(48, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_map_def", elfFile, 0));
EXPECT_EQ(28, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_prog_def", elfFile, 0));
}
}
TEST(BpfTest, bpfStructSizeTestPreT) {