Use consistent naming for allocating SPI.
Throughout the IPsec code (API, system server, netd) we use "reserve" SPI and "allocate" SPI interchangeably. This renames to use "allocate" everywhere for self-consistency and consistency with the kernel (ALLOCSPI). In javadoc, I am leaving the word "reserve" in several places because it is still an accurate description of how the method behaves. Bug: 69128142 Test: TreeHugger should be enough Change-Id: I8ea603b4612303b0393beef04032671fa53d2106
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Nathan Harold
parent
49f174beba
commit
fbe3a82340
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceParameterizedTest {
|
||||
.thenReturn(TEST_SPI_OUT);
|
||||
|
||||
IpSecSpiResponse spiResp =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
IpSecTransform.DIRECTION_OUT, mRemoteAddr, TEST_SPI_OUT, new Binder());
|
||||
assertEquals(IpSecManager.Status.OK, spiResp.status);
|
||||
assertEquals(TEST_SPI_OUT, spiResp.spi);
|
||||
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceParameterizedTest {
|
||||
.thenReturn(TEST_SPI_OUT);
|
||||
|
||||
IpSecSpiResponse spiResp =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
IpSecTransform.DIRECTION_OUT, mRemoteAddr, TEST_SPI_OUT, new Binder());
|
||||
|
||||
mIpSecService.releaseSecurityParameterIndex(spiResp.resourceId);
|
||||
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceParameterizedTest {
|
||||
.thenReturn(returnSpi);
|
||||
|
||||
IpSecSpiResponse spi =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
direction,
|
||||
NetworkUtils.numericToInetAddress(remoteAddress).getHostAddress(),
|
||||
IpSecManager.INVALID_SECURITY_PARAMETER_INDEX,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceTest {
|
||||
for (String address : invalidAddresses) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
IpSecSpiResponse spiResp =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
IpSecTransform.DIRECTION_OUT, address, DROID_SPI, new Binder());
|
||||
fail("Invalid address was passed through IpSecService validation: " + address);
|
||||
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
|
||||
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceTest {
|
||||
// Reserve spis until it fails.
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_SPIS; i++) {
|
||||
IpSecSpiResponse newSpi =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
0x1,
|
||||
InetAddress.getLoopbackAddress().getHostAddress(),
|
||||
DROID_SPI + i,
|
||||
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceTest {
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to reserve one more SPI, and should fail.
|
||||
IpSecSpiResponse extraSpi =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
0x1,
|
||||
InetAddress.getLoopbackAddress().getHostAddress(),
|
||||
DROID_SPI + MAX_NUM_SPIS,
|
||||
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ public class IpSecServiceTest {
|
||||
|
||||
// Should successfully reserve one more spi.
|
||||
extraSpi =
|
||||
mIpSecService.reserveSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
mIpSecService.allocateSecurityParameterIndex(
|
||||
0x1,
|
||||
InetAddress.getLoopbackAddress().getHostAddress(),
|
||||
DROID_SPI + MAX_NUM_SPIS,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user