Removes use of the special framework-modules naming scheme.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m java
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Build cleanup.
Change-Id: I0c31e2183353dfb5bd49f04f3455cb7b10be6866
Verify that the coordinator could fetch tether stats from BPF maps and
report the network stats to the service.
Bug: 150736748
Test: atest BpfCoordinatorTest
Change-Id: Ib1756159a2047c5db7d31359b0f288f840bd1bb1
Make BPF tethering offload coordinator, BpfCoordinator,
registers a network stats provider, BpfTetherStatsProvider, and
provide the tethering stats from the BPF map.
Bug: 150736748
Test: new test BpfCoordinatorTest
Change-Id: I22e71f87b67668f7e733e4f215d93bf5b2c9380d
KClass#getSimpleName need refer to kotlin-reflect.jar which need
include it in Andorid.bp. However, it's not necessary to use
KClass#getSimpleName but use Class#getSimpleName instead.
Test: atest TetheringTests
Bug: 157527499
Change-Id: I49bc336a276d30152402eba926cc583bc81e8e5c
Merged-In: I49bc336a276d30152402eba926cc583bc81e8e5c
The names of the individual modules do not quite follow the pattern
that java_sdk_library uses so this temporarily sets the following:
naming_scheme: "frameworks-modules"
That causes java_sdk_library to use a naming scheme that matches the
one used by the individual modules of this. It will be cleaned up
later.
Part of the purpose of the java_sdk_library is to hide the
implementation code and force users of the library to depend on stubs
for a well defined API. Ideally, it would allow access to the
implementation in those cases where it is safe, e.g. from within the
same APEX, or from tests for the implementation. Unfortunately, due to
limitations in the build it does not yet have enough information to
make that decision correctly which means that any code that needs to
compile against the implementation is broken which would prevent us
from converting the module to java_sdk_library.
However, the only way to provide the additional information to allow
the implementation to be correctly exposed is to convert the modules
to java_sdk_library; a cycle.
In order to break that cycle the java_sdk_library creates a special
<module>.impl target which is used directly by tests and any other code
that needs it. Once all the modules have been converted to a
java_sdk_library then we can resolve the limitations in the build and
remove the direct references to <module>.impl.
Test: m update-api
Bug: 155164730
Merged-In: If5c115f482751f9f4b5f047e9e401a18e36799ef
Merged-In: Id1c2e848430c49a2da7402244814cd084f5da77c
Change-Id: Id1c2e848430c49a2da7402244814cd084f5da77c
The names of the individual modules do not quite follow the pattern
that java_sdk_library uses so this temporarily sets the following:
naming_scheme: "frameworks-modules"
That causes java_sdk_library to use a naming scheme that matches the
one used by the individual modules of this. It will be cleaned up
later.
Part of the purpose of the java_sdk_library is to hide the
implementation code and force users of the library to depend on stubs
for a well defined API. Ideally, it would allow access to the
implementation in those cases where it is safe, e.g. from within the
same APEX, or from tests for the implementation. Unfortunately, due to
limitations in the build it does not yet have enough information to
make that decision correctly which means that any code that needs to
compile against the implementation is broken which would prevent us
from converting the module to java_sdk_library.
However, the only way to provide the additional information to allow
the implementation to be correctly exposed is to convert the modules
to java_sdk_library; a cycle.
In order to break that cycle the java_sdk_library creates a special
<module>.impl target which is used directly by tests and any other code
that needs it. Once all the modules have been converted to a
java_sdk_library then we can resolve the limitations in the build and
remove the direct references to <module>.impl.
Test: m Tethering InProcessTethering checkapi
Bug: 155164730
Merged-In: If5c115f482751f9f4b5f047e9e401a18e36799ef
Change-Id: Id1c2e848430c49a2da7402244814cd084f5da77c
KClass#getSimpleName need refer to kotlin-reflect.jar which need
include it in Andorid.bp. However, it's not necessary to use
KClass#getSimpleName but use Class#getSimpleName instead.
Test: atest TetheringTests
Bug: 157527499
Change-Id: I49bc336a276d30152402eba926cc583bc81e8e5c
Extend the timeout to lower the EthernetTetheringTest flaky.
Besides, also explicitly exempt entitlement check in
EtetherntTetheringTest because it do not test tethering upstream
currently. Thus, the tests would not be interrupted by entitlement
check if test SIM is entitlement required.
Bug: 156713866
Test: TetheringCoverageTests, CtsTehteringTest
Merged-In: I45e8e8d737486def9d0de8943ec7f09ca0942a0b
Change-Id: I45e8e8d737486def9d0de8943ec7f09ca0942a0b
The names of the individual modules do not quite follow the pattern
that java_sdk_library uses so this temporarily sets the following:
naming_scheme: "frameworks-modules"
That causes java_sdk_library to use a naming scheme that matches the
one used by the individual modules of this. It will be cleaned up
later.
Part of the purpose of the java_sdk_library is to hide the
implementation code and force users of the library to depend on stubs
for a well defined API. Ideally, it would allow access to the
implementation in those cases where it is safe, e.g. from within the
same APEX, or from tests for the implementation. Unfortunately, due to
limitations in the build it does not yet have enough information to
make that decision correctly which means that any code that needs to
compile against the implementation is broken which would prevent us
from converting the module to java_sdk_library.
However, the only way to provide the additional information to allow
the implementation to be correctly exposed is to convert the modules
to java_sdk_library; a cycle.
In order to break that cycle the java_sdk_library creates a special
<module>.impl target which is used directly by tests and any other code
that needs it. Once all the modules have been converted to a
java_sdk_library then we can resolve the limitations in the build and
remove the direct references to <module>.impl.
Test: m Tethering InProcessTethering checkapi
Bug: 155164730
Change-Id: If5c115f482751f9f4b5f047e9e401a18e36799ef
Extend the timeout to lower the EthernetTetheringTest flaky.
Besides, also explicitly exempt entitlement check in
EtetherntTetheringTest because it do not test tethering upstream
currently. Thus, the tests would not be interrupted by entitlement
check if test SIM is entitlement required.
Bug: 156713866
Test: TetheringCoverageTests, CtsTehteringTest
Change-Id: I45e8e8d737486def9d0de8943ec7f09ca0942a0b
- Add New class PrivateAddressCoordinator to coordinate the private
address conflict problem.
- Downstream prefix would be random in 192.168.0.0/24 ~
192.168.255.0/24.
- If new upstream prefix is conflict with existing downstream prefix,
downstream would be kicked out and it would request a new one.
- The last conflict upstream prefixes would be blacklist. Avoid to
select downstream prefix which is conflict with prefixes in blacklist.
Bug: 130879722
Test: -build, flash, boot
-atest TetheringTests
Change-Id: Ib45b87bcd9eeb5da03fb7ec90b1af9ca53998cf5
If upstream is cellular, set the TTL in Router Advertisements to
"network-set TTL - 1" for carrier requirement. For other non-cellular
upstream, set TTL as "network-set TTL + 1" to preventing arbitrary
distinction between tethered and untethered traffic.
Bug: 154776299
Test: atest TetheringTests
Merged-In: I7f2696a642f96c6aafb5613b980bf5bcdd08bbda
Change-Id: I7f2696a642f96c6aafb5613b980bf5bcdd08bbda
Bug: 154869719
Test: atest TetheringTests
Original-Change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/1288503
Fix TetheringServiceTest test WRITE_SETTINGS permission failure
AdoptShellPermissionIdentity can not pass permission check by
Settings#checkAndNoteWriteSettingsOperation. It would compare the caller
uid and its package name. See error below:
1. java.lang.SecurityException:
Specified package com.android.shell under uid 10239 but it is really 2000
2. java.lang.SecurityException:
uid 10245 does not have android.permission.UPDATE_APP_OPS_STATS.
Override the method and test if caller hold WRITE_SETTINGS directly.
Bug: 154869719
Test: TetheringTests, TetheringCoverageTests, NetworkStackNextTests,
NetworkStackCoverageTests
Original-Change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/1313806
Change-Id: I7beea3f011d930e433443ed62d772a3f8cce5d78
Merged-In: I7beea3f011d930e433443ed62d772a3f8cce5d78
If upstream is cellular, set the TTL in Router Advertisements to
"network-set TTL - 1" for carrier requirement. For other non-cellular
upstream, set TTL as "network-set TTL + 1" to preventing arbitrary
distinction between tethered and untethered traffic.
Bug: 154776299
Test: atest TetheringTests
Change-Id: I7f2696a642f96c6aafb5613b980bf5bcdd08bbda
AdoptShellPermissionIdentity can not pass permission check by
Settings#checkAndNoteWriteSettingsOperation. It would compare the caller
uid and its package name. See error below:
1. java.lang.SecurityException:
Specified package com.android.shell under uid 10239 but it is really 2000
2. java.lang.SecurityException:
uid 10245 does not have android.permission.UPDATE_APP_OPS_STATS.
Override the method and test if caller hold WRITE_SETTINGS directly.
Bug: 154869719
Test: TetheringTests, TetheringCoverageTests, NetworkStackNextTests,
NetworkStackCoverageTests
Change-Id: I2a60c4d66ef30028f9663159f85464ea815248e2
Add the specific implementation of onNewPrefixRequest callback
on IpServer side, also refactor some common code.
Bug: 130741856
Test: atest TetheringTests
Merged-In: If2871bf899cb5890bbfee18063a194c92b6f474e
Change-Id: If2871bf899cb5890bbfee18063a194c92b6f474e
