Tethering is updatable apex module that was launched in R, hence it and
all it dependencies should specify min_sdk_version <= 30.
Test: m
Bug: 171668006
Bug: 171330443
Change-Id: Ic91cf96dda6419d1038b0329b920f9cd24482aef
Merged-In: Ic91cf96dda6419d1038b0329b920f9cd24482aef
(cherry picked from commit bee20e84f8)
(cherry picked from commit 1fe1e539e1)
Tethering is updatable apex module that was launched in R, hence it and
all it dependencies should specify min_sdk_version <= 30.
Test: m
Bug: 171668006
Bug: 171330443
Change-Id: Ic91cf96dda6419d1038b0329b920f9cd24482aef
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Mark is owner and gave +2
Modules shouldn't have TestApis, as documented in go/android-api-types.
Additionally, nothing depends on these TestApis existing.
Bug: 170395679
Test: m checkapi
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick
Change-Id: I6e2c8298e90b4b54f0264be974d036fa08cd5632
Modules shouldn't have TestApis, as documented in go/android-api-types.
Additionally, nothing depends on these TestApis existing.
Bug: 170395679
Test: m checkapi
Change-Id: I6e2c8298e90b4b54f0264be974d036fa08cd5632
Merged-In: I6e2c8298e90b4b54f0264be974d036fa08cd5632
//visibility:override is no longer needed for impl_library_visibility
to override visibility.
Removing this allows the defaults module to specify better defaults.
- Stub libraries are made publicly visible, via `visibility`
- Impl libraries are private by default, but visibility is extended
by the modules
Bug: 165017290
Test: m
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: build refactor
Change-Id: Ibf35bfac5c99a21125f89ba10945f3364217b90f
This change is a combination of following changes:
1) Tethering: add TETHERING_WIGIG type
Currently both WIFI and WIGIG use the same tethering type,
TETHERING_WIFI. This causes conflicts between the frameworks,
when both WIFI and WIGIG SoftAPs are started, one or both will
not work.
Fix this by using a seperate tethering type for WIGIG.
2) Tethering: remove TETHERING_WIGIG state machine on interface down
The wigig state machine relies on a TETHERING_STATE_CHANGED broadcast
that is sent when the tethering state machine is first created, during
interface up. Currently the tethering state machine is not removed
on interface down except for TETHERING_BLUETOOTH, and as a result
wigig tethering only works the first time SoftAP is started.
In order to fix this, remove the tethering state machine on interface
down for TETHERING_WIGIG as well.
Bug: 143356416
Test: TetheringCoverageTests
Change-Id: Ic4d3aca0ed69234093af7f0206dab3335938c52a
Tethering resource configuration is move from framwork to tethering
module. Since tethering resource would not be accessible from outside
of tethering module, EntitlementManager would tell Settings the
entitlement configuration via intent extra when run entitlement check.
Bug: 146918263
Test: atest TetheringTests
Change-Id: I6f23553bb1da5f0b767f920b32a86fafb9e00b9e
Merged-In: I6f23553bb1da5f0b767f920b32a86fafb9e00b9e
Add commit message here for reference:
Tethering resource configuration is move from framework to tethering
module. The resource would not be accessible from outside of tethering
module.
List the replacements of framework resources usage and intent extra:
1. R.string.config_mobile_hotspot_provision_response
--> android.net.extra.TETHER_PROVISIONING_RESPONSE.
2. R.string.config_mobile_hotspot_provision_app_no_ui
--> android.net.extra.TETHER_UI_PROVISIONING_APP_NAME
3. R.array.config_mobile_hotspot_provision_app
--> android.net.extra.TETHER_SILENT_PROVISIONING_ACTION
Besides, the current active subId would put in
android.net.extra.TETHER_SUBID
Note: They are not APIs because of API freeze. Now both tethering module
and Settings define these strings independently.
Bug: 146918263
Test: atest TetherServiceTest
atest TetherProvisioningActivityTest
This reverts commit 9988903174.
Reason for revert: Resume the CL and put this CL with settings part in the same topic to avoid break.
Change-Id: I114b4c258743661df51e5a969e150047a292e035
Original CL has dependencies with unmerged settings change: https://googleplex-android-review.git.corp.google.com/c/platform/packages/apps/Settings/+/11524847
They should be in the same topic, revert it first. Will resume it and put the same with settings part CL.
This reverts commit 217d7b01f8.
Reason for revert: This break hotspot because it should merged with settings part together.
Bug: 158836492
Change-Id: I94d3ee25168cfb3d125030654c4bb8ddd670abfc
Tethering resource configuration is move from framwork to tethering
module. Since tethering resource would not be accessible from outside
of tethering module, EntitlementManager would tell Settings the
entitlement configuration via intent extra when run entitlement check.
Bug: 146918263
Test: atest TetheringTests
Change-Id: I6f23553bb1da5f0b767f920b32a86fafb9e00b9e
Removes use of the special framework-modules naming scheme.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m java
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Build cleanup.
Change-Id: I3896d7c91e937f503b49f5df011c21ee51219652
Merged-In: I0c31e2183353dfb5bd49f04f3455cb7b10be6866
Merged-In: I3b78fcbcacc3df787e171d6eedeef1e51b087615
(cherry picked from adac7d2cc3)
Switching from java_library to java_sdk_library switched the meaning
of the module name from referring to the implementation library to
referring to the stubs. This change updates the visibility rules to
reflect that new meaning.
Visibility rules that were previously set for the java_library have
been moved to the impl_library_visibility property and the special
//visibility:override value has been prepended to prevent it from
inheriting the values from the visibility property.
Visibility rules set for the stubs (via stubs_library_visibility)
property have been moved to the visibility property.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m nothing
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Build cleanup
Change-Id: Icc9bc5a9ef86cf7ba0f15c2b2a4abd596ec9f640
Merged-In: Icc9bc5a9ef86cf7ba0f15c2b2a4abd596ec9f640
(cherry picked from a17cf677b5)
Removes use of the special framework-modules naming scheme.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m java
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Build cleanup.
Change-Id: I3b78fcbcacc3df787e171d6eedeef1e51b087615
Merged-In: I0c31e2183353dfb5bd49f04f3455cb7b10be6866
(cherry picked from 8b864fb45ce79051437f13c2a19510718ea3b7aa)
Removes use of the special framework-modules naming scheme.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m java
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Build cleanup.
Change-Id: I0c31e2183353dfb5bd49f04f3455cb7b10be6866
Switching from java_library to java_sdk_library switched the meaning
of the module name from referring to the implementation library to
referring to the stubs. This change updates the visibility rules to
reflect that new meaning.
Visibility rules that were previously set for the java_library have
been moved to the impl_library_visibility property and the special
//visibility:override value has been prepended to prevent it from
inheriting the values from the visibility property.
Visibility rules set for the stubs (via stubs_library_visibility)
property have been moved to the visibility property.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m nothing
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Build cleanup
Change-Id: Icc9bc5a9ef86cf7ba0f15c2b2a4abd596ec9f640
The names of the individual modules do not quite follow the pattern
that java_sdk_library uses so this temporarily sets the following:
naming_scheme: "frameworks-modules"
That causes java_sdk_library to use a naming scheme that matches the
one used by the individual modules of this. It will be cleaned up
later.
Part of the purpose of the java_sdk_library is to hide the
implementation code and force users of the library to depend on stubs
for a well defined API. Ideally, it would allow access to the
implementation in those cases where it is safe, e.g. from within the
same APEX, or from tests for the implementation. Unfortunately, due to
limitations in the build it does not yet have enough information to
make that decision correctly which means that any code that needs to
compile against the implementation is broken which would prevent us
from converting the module to java_sdk_library.
However, the only way to provide the additional information to allow
the implementation to be correctly exposed is to convert the modules
to java_sdk_library; a cycle.
In order to break that cycle the java_sdk_library creates a special
<module>.impl target which is used directly by tests and any other code
that needs it. Once all the modules have been converted to a
java_sdk_library then we can resolve the limitations in the build and
remove the direct references to <module>.impl.
Test: m update-api
Bug: 155164730
Merged-In: If5c115f482751f9f4b5f047e9e401a18e36799ef
Merged-In: Id1c2e848430c49a2da7402244814cd084f5da77c
Change-Id: Id1c2e848430c49a2da7402244814cd084f5da77c
The names of the individual modules do not quite follow the pattern
that java_sdk_library uses so this temporarily sets the following:
naming_scheme: "frameworks-modules"
That causes java_sdk_library to use a naming scheme that matches the
one used by the individual modules of this. It will be cleaned up
later.
Part of the purpose of the java_sdk_library is to hide the
implementation code and force users of the library to depend on stubs
for a well defined API. Ideally, it would allow access to the
implementation in those cases where it is safe, e.g. from within the
same APEX, or from tests for the implementation. Unfortunately, due to
limitations in the build it does not yet have enough information to
make that decision correctly which means that any code that needs to
compile against the implementation is broken which would prevent us
from converting the module to java_sdk_library.
However, the only way to provide the additional information to allow
the implementation to be correctly exposed is to convert the modules
to java_sdk_library; a cycle.
In order to break that cycle the java_sdk_library creates a special
<module>.impl target which is used directly by tests and any other code
that needs it. Once all the modules have been converted to a
java_sdk_library then we can resolve the limitations in the build and
remove the direct references to <module>.impl.
Test: m Tethering InProcessTethering checkapi
Bug: 155164730
Merged-In: If5c115f482751f9f4b5f047e9e401a18e36799ef
Change-Id: Id1c2e848430c49a2da7402244814cd084f5da77c
The names of the individual modules do not quite follow the pattern
that java_sdk_library uses so this temporarily sets the following:
naming_scheme: "frameworks-modules"
That causes java_sdk_library to use a naming scheme that matches the
one used by the individual modules of this. It will be cleaned up
later.
Part of the purpose of the java_sdk_library is to hide the
implementation code and force users of the library to depend on stubs
for a well defined API. Ideally, it would allow access to the
implementation in those cases where it is safe, e.g. from within the
same APEX, or from tests for the implementation. Unfortunately, due to
limitations in the build it does not yet have enough information to
make that decision correctly which means that any code that needs to
compile against the implementation is broken which would prevent us
from converting the module to java_sdk_library.
However, the only way to provide the additional information to allow
the implementation to be correctly exposed is to convert the modules
to java_sdk_library; a cycle.
In order to break that cycle the java_sdk_library creates a special
<module>.impl target which is used directly by tests and any other code
that needs it. Once all the modules have been converted to a
java_sdk_library then we can resolve the limitations in the build and
remove the direct references to <module>.impl.
Test: m Tethering InProcessTethering checkapi
Bug: 155164730
Change-Id: If5c115f482751f9f4b5f047e9e401a18e36799ef
Merge the otherwise unused tethering-aidl-interfaces into
framework-tethering.
This is in preparation for converting to use java_sdk_library.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Merged-In: I4583539d11ba69320aa5a0dfcfee072c81affac2
Change-Id: I4583539d11ba69320aa5a0dfcfee072c81affac2
(cherry picked from commit 267dd95c3e93f75c42c3f4e5cf576829b528f6c2)
Merge the otherwise unused tethering-aidl-interfaces into
framework-tethering.
This is in preparation for converting to use java_sdk_library.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I4583539d11ba69320aa5a0dfcfee072c81affac2
Modules contributing mainline modules (APK/APEX) should set
min_sdk_version as well as apex_available.
For now setting min_sdk_version doesn't change build outputs.
But build-time checks will be added soon.
Bug: 145796956
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: Ifaecb49a47a1f43edea3ea06e1cf704a177d1044
Change-Id: Ifaecb49a47a1f43edea3ea06e1cf704a177d1044
(cherry picked from commit 33aa294e96f13906f596e427b96652fe80cf199b)
Modules contributing mainline modules (APK/APEX) should set
min_sdk_version as well as apex_available.
For now setting min_sdk_version doesn't change build outputs.
But build-time checks will be added soon.
Bug: 145796956
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: Ifaecb49a47a1f43edea3ea06e1cf704a177d1044
