* changes:
Adjust a test for policy scoring
Enable policy ranking
Add CTS to verify NetworkAgent#setLingerDuration
Allow network providers to set the linger duration.
Fix nascent timer never get removed
[NS13] Remove the last usage of the legacy int
Add documentation
Use filter from CollectionUtils.
Fix a bug where updates of offers won't find existing offers
[NS12] Address comments on NS09
[NS11] Fix yieldToBadWifi over the policy scoring
Add doc for NetworkScore#getLegacyInt
Expose sendNetworkScore that takes a NetworkScore
Currently, when a network that uses 464xlat is torn down,
NetworkCallbacks will receive onLinkPropertiesChanged after
onLost. This is confusing and incorrect.
The incorrect callback is sent because handleLinkProperties
checks that the netId of the agent still exists, not that the
NetworkAgent is still registered. This is normally correct,
because the NetworkAgent is removed from mNetworkAgentInfos and
the netId are removed from mNetworkForNetId by the same method,
disconnectAndDestroyNetwork.
In this specific case it's not correct, because the call to
handleUpdateLinkProperties is from disconnectAndDestroyNetwork
itself via nai.clatd.update and calls Nat464Xlat#stop.
No other callers of handleUpdateLinkProperties are affected
because:
- EVENT_NETWORK_PROPERTIES_CHANGED is called only by
maybeHandleNetworkAgentMessage, which first checks that the
NetworkAgent is registered.
- handlePrivateDnsSettingsChanged only looks at registered
NetworkAgents (it loops over mNetworkAgentInfos).
- handlePrivateDnsValidationUpdate, handleNat64PrefixEvent and
handleCapportApiDataUpdate call getNetworkAgentInfoForNetId,
which will correctly determine that the agent is no longer
registered, since they run on the handler thread and thus
cannot run at the same time as disconnectAndDestroyNetwork.
The existing code contains a check for the netId being current.
This is intended to ensure that an update from a NetworkAgent
cannot affect another agent with the same Network. This extra
check is not necessary, because code running on the handler
thread can never observe a NetworkAgent in mNetworkAgentInfos
unless mNetworkForNetId maps that NetworkAgent's Network to that
NetworkAgent. This is because mNetworkForNetId is updated by the
same methods as mNetworkAgentInfos, and those updates occur on
the handler thread. So all code on the handler thread will see
those two as consistent.
Bug: 176496580
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests CtsNetTestCases HostsideVpnTests
Change-Id: I944f4c6ad36206bdccd85a6ea7ef71324a29c685
Instead of using api_only: true, use a single java_sdk_library to
generate both framework-connectivity stubs and
framework-connectivity.impl.
Original change (project moved):
I76d7cf1ba31a3f38ae6b9facbf1b668860c8c165
Bug: 183600168
Test: m
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Change-Id: I07d8c4c92c91939b8e8890fdb5db517b75faee2c
All targets need min_sdk_version 30 to be included in the tethering
APEX. They will actually never be used on SDK 30 and are only loaded on
31, but this is necessary to be included in com.android.tethering.
Original change (project moved):
I190fd1f3c9fabff057d0a2bd7f45b63a4fe447b3
This also includes changes to the lint baseline to make it match actual
filenames.
Bug: 171540887
Test: m
Test: m lint-check
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Change-Id: I24198565bc98d85d0c036be02e3a6c311b5bb2a3
All targets need min_sdk_version 30 to be included in the tethering
APEX. They will actually never be used on SDK 30 and are only loaded on
31, but this is necessary to be included in com.android.tethering.
Original change (project moved):
I190fd1f3c9fabff057d0a2bd7f45b63a4fe447b3
Bug: 171540887
Test: m
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Change-Id: I3db00acc79b11058a1c235916b9bfe6c759afda5
We are enabling a new lint check where the min sdk != compile sdk.
It has produced a lot of errors and adding the baseline file(s)
allows us to continue work without introducing more problems.
This is a partial cherry-pick of change merged downstream.
Bug: 150847901
Test: m lint-check
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Change-Id: I214d60e858b7c03885d4d1c9a083e67a9340b4fe
Test: Passes all presubmits, been tested in labs
Bug: 184834350
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: If33884aa245bcc8817bbc9c2fdfab035249e7301
Change-Id: If33884aa245bcc8817bbc9c2fdfab035249e7301
(cherry-picked from ag/14150470)
By design, the nascent timer will be removed after a network
satisfied first request. However, this never happens.
Because the mInactive is false when that happens, so isNascent
is never true.
Furthermore, when removing a nascent timer, the inactivity
state can never be updated since no condition in the
updateInactivityState will be met to update the state correctly.
Thus, update inactive state accordingly when adding/removing the
nascent timer.
Test: TH
Bug: 184227264
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I4c1521b6e0ef68ac489771a2ab6b09ef3e381577
Change-Id: I4c1521b6e0ef68ac489771a2ab6b09ef3e381577
(cherry-picked from ag/14060609)
Note that this requires removing part of a test, because
that part is testing that the a 50 bonus of the legacy
int is stronger than the validation penalty, which is
not a mechanic we want to have. When WiFi is unvalidated
and cell is unvalidated, cell should be kept in case it
validates, like is described in comments in
isNetworkPotentialSatisfier ; however this test is
checking that it *IS* reaped off if the wifi score is
strong enough. This should be incorrect, and should not
be tested, so this patch removes the check.
Test: ConnectivityServiceTest
Bug: 184834350
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I8966abee59fea2d9f10f082aba87df6588b72762
Change-Id: I8966abee59fea2d9f10f082aba87df6588b72762
(cherry-picked from ag/14127306)
.equals() only work on cross-process Binder instances if casted to
a Binder instance first.
Bug: 184281544
Test: ConnectivityServiceTest. CTS test for this specific issue to come
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I7b9e0df21a3cca59659867a75792289ddee2f1d7
Change-Id: I7b9e0df21a3cca59659867a75792289ddee2f1d7
(cherry-picked from ag/14125149)
This doesn't reactivate the test because it's not yet fixed over int
scoring.
Bug: 184834350
Test: Remove @Ignore and run testAvoidBadWifi
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I32477db52eb50faabc499fa68e24ba07577782aa
Change-Id: I32477db52eb50faabc499fa68e24ba07577782aa
(cherry-picked from ag/14064906)
At this stage, this is turned off. Unit tests will be
in a followup change.
Test: In a followup
Bug: 167544279
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I4448a3546fbc1a3dddf757982c031c5f39ba2889
Change-Id: I4448a3546fbc1a3dddf757982c031c5f39ba2889
(cherry-picked from ag/14010222 with fixes)
This exposes a mechanism for network providers to tell
the network stack that a given network must be kept up
for some specific reason. This is meant to be easier
for them than to have to file a request, in particular
because there is no guaranteed way to make sure the
request will be best matched by any given network.
Test: new test for this
Bug: 167544279
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I238a3ee5ee9262477a23b897e4141769dd1505d1
Change-Id: I238a3ee5ee9262477a23b897e4141769dd1505d1
(cherry-picked from ag/13929760)
The design is very simply expressed :
An offer is needed for a request if and only if that offer
might beat the satisfier for that request.
The implementation of "might beat" is NetworkRanker#mightBeat.
Test: FrameworksNetTests FrameworksWifiTests NetworkStackTests
Bug: 167544279
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I0fe911eef2483ecbac48c733d56283b81538690a
Change-Id: I0fe911eef2483ecbac48c733d56283b81538690a
(cherry-picked from 7b6a33bd50)
This reverts commit 326f7bb023.
Reason for revert: broke errorprone:
"Error: Call requires API level 31 (current min is 30)"
Bug: 190350403
Change-Id: Ib778ba7a882dabc4d42ab9689e1cc51d09d9be62
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Now, PermissionMonitor reigster observer to listen the change
from all users, but "uids allowed on restricted networks" should
affect to all users instead of per each user. Thus, move the
setting from Settings.Secure to Settings.Global.
Bug: 189705071
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Merged-In: Ibea354d8dda1f02652a193820f3f9eb573b9a956
Change-Id: Ibea354d8dda1f02652a193820f3f9eb573b9a956
- Read MOBILE_DATA_PREFERRED_UIDS setting when system ready
- Register MOBILE_DATA_PREFERRED_UIDS setting observer
- Send uid ranges to netd when update mobile data preferred uids
Bug: 171872461
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Merged-In: I5153c770650594e05dfa8cf230d7381d790f4a55
(cherry-pick with minor conflicts)
Change-Id: I5153c770650594e05dfa8cf230d7381d790f4a55
NS04.5 removed a security that it shouldn't have. Reinstate it.
Bug: 167544279
Test: ConnectivityServiceTest
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: If614da813a96d1b50a16fa4be5659e1647d9469d
Change-Id: If614da813a96d1b50a16fa4be5659e1647d9469d
(cherry-picked from ag/13975118)
...instead of a Messenger.
This will be useful later to compare whether a given offer is
offered by the same provider satisfying a request.
Bug: 167544279
Test: ConnectivityServiceTest
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I975a9439021c7fa511c50ac982819b6dd146291e
Change-Id: I975a9439021c7fa511c50ac982819b6dd146291e
(cherry-picked from 148dcce559)
