On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 02:54:13PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Excerpts from Matthieu Herrb's message of Sun Nov 01 09:34:35 -0800 2009:
>
> > +AC_CHECK_FUNCS([SHA1Init], [HAVE_LIBC_SHA1=yes])
>
> I'd suggest AC_CHECK_FUNC instead; as far as I can tell, AC_CHECK_FUNCS
> will also define HAVE_SHA1INIT. Also, can you use HAVE_LIBC_SHA1
> consistently rather than having two separate names (HAVE_LIBC_SHA1 and
> HAVE_SHA1_IN_LIBC)? Yes, I know one is a preprocessor symbol and the
> other is a cpp shell variable, but I think that will work anyway.
>
New version taking you comments into account.
From: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb@laas.fr>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:19:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add a probe for SHA1 functions in libc in *BSD.
The interface is the same as the one in libmd.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
48b8c076a7