This is a start and two tests succeed:
Tested expired AT&T SIM and waiting 15min for alarm to fire.
Tested a provisioned Verizon SIM and works normally.
I've NOT tested AT&T where I've properly completed the provisioning.
I've NOT tested T-Mobile SIM either provisioned or not-provisioned.
I've NOT tested provisioning over WiFi.
I've NOT tested that WiFi <-> Mobile works
I've NOT tested voice calls, SMS, MMS
...
The current bug is below, but it is poorly named either it should be
renamed or a new bug created.
Bug: 13190133
Change-Id: I0a09f642614cd27a8655e9dae764b8999ce485b8
With netd allowing overlapping rules for uid range rules the interface
name is needed to make sure only the correct rule is removed.
Bug: 12134439
Change-Id: I94f77f154f49ca8d5f6cf49683a4473cc92c3eb7
The value for the TCP initial receive window comes from,
in order,
kernel
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_init_rwnd
init.rc (via properties)
net.tcp.default_init_rwnd
properties
net.tcp.default_init_rwnd
gservices
Settings.Global.TCP_DEFAULT_INIT_RWND
Bug: 12020135
Change-Id: I0e271be19472900fa9f3bab037d53383ec014a9e
SO_BINDTODEVICE is not needed with policy routing.
SO_BINDTODEVICE was also used on the default iface which causes problems
when the default iface is IPv6 only and the socket tries to connect to a
IPv4 address.
Bug: 12940882
Change-Id: I5b2bde0ac5459433fc5749f509072a548532f730
requestRouteToHost will only allow system applications to make routes
exempt from the VPN's routing rules.
If a VPN is currently running and a non-system app requests a route it
will only succeed if that host is currently covered by a VPN exempt
routing rule. Otherwise it will fail.
For example, if a VPN is running and the MMS network is brought online
those routes will be added as VPN exempt. If an application then tries
to request a route to a MMS endpoint it will succeed because the routes
already exist. If an application tries to request a route to a host
covered by the VPN the call will fail.
Bug: 12937545
Change-Id: If7bcec91bbb96c62c8fb69748c975847e6c00b6f
The calling package name will be used to check if an application is a
system application when deciding if a route should be exempt from VPN
routing rules.
Bug: 12937545
Change-Id: I2c09c875fe9bb9685871a0a801ddcbb32fc17405
This may mean that secondary networks have bad network settings,
but currently default settings are overriden by secondary nets
which seems worse.
bug:13211589
Change-Id: I08d56e618208781bf6b21a88663c2b8503a4f226
Make Proxy.validate() return valid/invalid int code, instead of throwing
exceptions. If invalid, detailed reason code is returned (currently for
Settings UI use).
bug: 13248097
Change-Id: Ic68d03f666f1cd63667afc311de7dc370d233901
This may mean that secondary networks have bad network settings,
but currently default settings are overriden by secondary nets
which seems worse.
bug:13211589
Change-Id: I3ef1a17ccde05306d786729c4369a31f78b2ebcf
Also add new API for determining whether the current data network
is active, and thus better scheduling network operations. This
API is designed to not be tied to a mobile network -- regardless
of the network, apps can use it to determine whether they should
initiate activity or wait. On non-mobile networks, it simply always
reports as the network being active.
This changed involved reworking how the idle timers are done so
that we only register an idle timer with the current default
network. This way, we can know whether we currently expect to
get callbacks about the network being active, or should just always
report that it is active. (Ultimately we need to be getting this
radio active data from the radio itself.)
Change-Id: Iaf6cc91a960d7542a70b72f87a7db26d12c4ea8e
Do this both on input from apps (giving error) and between wifi and
ConnectivityService (ignoring bad data). This means removing all
addresses beyond the first and all routes but the first default and
the implied direct-connect routes.
We do this because the user can't monitor the others (no UI), their
support wasn't intended, they allow redirection of all traffic
without user knowledge and they allow circumvention of legacy VPNs.
This should not move forward from JB as it breaks IPv6 and K has
a more resilient VPN.
Bug:12663469
Change-Id: I0d92db7efc30a1bb3e5b8c6e5595bdb9793a16f2
Conflicts:
core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java
services/java/com/android/server/WifiService.java
wifi/java/android/net/wifi/WifiStateMachine.java
Remove the recently added RIL_REQUEST_SET_RADIO_MODE command and update
the definition of the RIL_REQUEST_NV_RESET_CONFIG parameter.
Also remove some accidentally added debug log lines.
Bug: 12864208
Change-Id: I6f035d6900c9fcb1427bad62057d7b4a1d3cd99c
requestRouteToHost will only allow system applications to make routes
exempt from the VPN's routing rules.
If a VPN is currently running and a non-system app requests a route it
will only succeed if that host is currently covered by a VPN exempt
routing rule. Otherwise it will fail.
For example, if a VPN is running and the MMS network is brought online
those routes will be added as VPN exempt. If an application then tries
to request a route to a MMS endpoint it will succeed because the routes
already exist. If an application tries to request a route to a host
covered by the VPN the call will fail.
Bug: 12937545
Change-Id: If7bcec91bbb96c62c8fb69748c975847e6c00b6f
The value for the TCP initial receive window comes from,
in order,
kernel
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_init_rwnd
init.rc (via properties)
net.tcp.default_init_rwnd
properties
net.tcp.default_init_rwnd
gservices
Settings.Global.TCP_DEFAULT_INIT_RWND
Bug: 12020135
Change-Id: I0e271be19472900fa9f3bab037d53383ec014a9e
