The existing method is confusing (the argument used to be called
includeDying) and it puts the burden on the caller (which need to
understand what the parameter means).
Furthermore:
- The majority of calls are for getUsers(excludeDying=true).
- The calls for getUsers(excludeDying=false) are equivalent to
calls to getUsers()
Test: m
Test: a VpnTest ConnectivityServiceTest PermissionMonitorTest
Bug: 157921703
Change-Id: Ife767a40b7b7790ba28b5377046de822ddbf275c
Merged-In: Ife767a40b7b7790ba28b5377046de822ddbf275c
(cherry picked from commit 72eeb557e7)
On top of being a cleanup this is useful for the S Network
Selection project that will need to enrich the Network
Agent API, and as such should not have to support legacy
agents.
Test: FrameworksNetTests NetworkStackTests
Bug: 167544279
Change-Id: Id3e5f6e19829c64074cd6a52c5f950cee56b860b
The class-level @IgnoreUpTo annotation only applies with that runner.
Change-Id: I065618f2345c1d91de2fa1f2f558e5ed5b066f3e
Fixes: 174268969
Bug: 171505922
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests:android.net.OemNetworkPreferencesTest
Instead, make Vpn#onUserAdded and Vpn#onUserRemoved notify CS
of UID range changes through the VPN's NetworkAgent.
After this change, ConnectivityService no longer touches the
VPN's NetworkCapabilities directly, which is a much cleaner
design.
Bug: 173331190
Test: passes existing tests in ConnectivityServiceTest
Change-Id: If2201f392cdb5f00c89a97683ad4ce6bda7b89e5
This is only used for NetworkStatsService and only called on the
handler thread, so it can be replaced by a simple scan over
mNetworkAgentInfos without having to take any locks.
Bug: 173331190
Test: passes existing tests in ConnectivityServiceTest
Change-Id: I194e0cc55603a0f59f7138f38329f505b55da132
Much of registerNetworkAgent calls internal ConnectivityService
methods which generally assume that they are not processing an
IPC and are running under the system's calling identity.
However, only the call to makeNetworkMonitor is run with caller
identity cleared. Expand the scope of clearing the caller
identity over the creation of the nai.
Bug: 173331190
Test: passes existing tests in ConnectivityServiceTest
Change-Id: Icad28601a612fb5e1ed0451ec9e2066f4e766d0e
This CL allows an app that has the MANAGE_TEST_NETWORKS
permission to create test VPN networks.
The code enforces that such networks can never apply to any UIDs
and thus will never carry any traffic.
Bug: 173331190
Test: passes existing tests, moved tests pass
Change-Id: I5befea0e3b4b6dce4ca0c6a04471a055186b644c
Add support to ConnectivityService to track underlying networks
directly instead of through the Vpn class.
1. Communicate all information necessary to propagate underlying
network capabilities to ConnectivityService via NetworkAgent.
This includes:
a. Underlying networks:
- Add SystemApi for NetworkAgent to declare its underlying
networks to ConnectivityService, and use it in Vpn.
- Add a new declaredUnderlyingNetworks member to
NetworkAgentInfo and store the underlying networks in it.
Move propagation of underlying network capabilities to
mixInCapabilities, which is a natural place for it.
b. "Always metered" bit:
- Communicate this to ConnectivityService via the existing
NOT_METERED capability. Store it in a new declaredMetered
boolean in NetworkAgentInfo to separate it cleanly from
the NOT_METERED bit in the capabilities, which depends on
whether the underlying networks are metered or not. In
order to ensure that this is only ever changed when a NC
update is received from a NetworkAgent, define a new
processCapabilitiesFromAgent similar to the existing
processLinkPropertiesFromAgent.
2. Ensure that propagating underlying network capabilities does
not read the VPN's NetworkCapabilities. In order to do this,
ensure that all relevant information on underlying networks
and metering is sent to ConnectivityService at NetworkAgent
registration time. CS still calls Vpn#updateCapabilities when
a user is added/removed, but that is deleted in a future CL.
3. Slightly generalize propagating underlying network
capabilities because there may be other network types that
also have underlying networks that aren't VPNs (e.g., VCN).
- Introduce a new supportsUnderlyingNetworks() boolean method
in NetworkAgentInfo.
- Rename updateAllVpnsCapabilities to
propagateUnderlyingNetworkCapabilities.
This commit does not move the actual logic of calculating the
underlying capabilities out of Vpn.java. That can be done in a
subsequent change once CS stops calling getUnderlyingNetworks().
This commit also does not modify any of the other code in CS that
directly accesses VPNs' underlying networks.
Bug: 173331190
Test: passes existing tests in ConnectivityServiceTest
Test: CTS test in r.android.com/1511114
Test: atest CtsNetTestCases:Ikev2VpnTest HostsideVpnTests
Change-Id: I5f76cb1aa4866efed3d5c4590e931fdb0e994f8d
Currently, checkConnectivityDiagnosticsPermissions takes the VPN
lock to examine the VPN's underlying networks. Use the underlying
network data that is available in ConnectivityService instead.
Bug: 173331190
Test: passes existing tests in ConnectivityServiceTest
Change-Id: Ia1c366c5e9974d4d2c4b38030e66c007d62020ff
The method - satisfiedBy() has changed to canBeSatisfiedBy()
starting from Android R, so the method - canBeSatisfiedBy()
cannot be found when running this test on Android Q.
Ignore verifying canBeSatisfiedBy() on Android Q to fix this
problem.
Bug: 173911834
Test: Run MatchAllNetworkSpecifierTest on Android Q, R, S.
Original-Change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/1508137
Merged-In: Ibe317b56f82d3ea100b1d78c3907dce4f2fd964d
Change-Id: Ibe317b56f82d3ea100b1d78c3907dce4f2fd964d
* changes:
Test passing an underlying network array with null network in it.
Make testVpnNetworkActive more deterministic.
Add a test for restricted profile added/removed with VPN up.
This test is a bit brittle because it sets the underlying
networks while the VPN is undergoing validation by
NetworkMonitor. The test does attempt to disable validation,
but that's not actually possible - the only thing that's possible
is to tell NetworkMonitor to validate immediately without sending
any probes. So the underlying network change races with the
validation. I'm not sure why the test isn't flaky. It might be
because both the network change and the validation result in a
capabilities change, and the test expects "a capabilities change"
without expressing what change that should be.
Make this a bit more predictable by ensuring that the network
validates before the underlying networks are set.
This is useful because an upcoming CL will change the way
underlying network capabilities are propagated. With this test
CL, both the old and the new code pass.
Bug: 173331190
Test: test-only change
Change-Id: I319858228e8d097c0b60a107029f296385f91269
