This is a start and two tests succeed:
Tested expired AT&T SIM and waiting 15min for alarm to fire.
Tested a provisioned Verizon SIM and works normally.
I've NOT tested AT&T where I've properly completed the provisioning.
I've NOT tested T-Mobile SIM either provisioned or not-provisioned.
I've NOT tested provisioning over WiFi.
I've NOT tested that WiFi <-> Mobile works
I've NOT tested voice calls, SMS, MMS
...
The current bug is below, but it is poorly named either it should be
renamed or a new bug created.
Bug: 13190133
Change-Id: I0a09f642614cd27a8655e9dae764b8999ce485b8
With netd allowing overlapping rules for uid range rules the interface
name is needed to make sure only the correct rule is removed.
Bug: 12134439
Change-Id: I94f77f154f49ca8d5f6cf49683a4473cc92c3eb7
The value for the TCP initial receive window comes from,
in order,
kernel
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_init_rwnd
init.rc (via properties)
net.tcp.default_init_rwnd
properties
net.tcp.default_init_rwnd
gservices
Settings.Global.TCP_DEFAULT_INIT_RWND
Bug: 12020135
Change-Id: I0e271be19472900fa9f3bab037d53383ec014a9e
SO_BINDTODEVICE is not needed with policy routing.
SO_BINDTODEVICE was also used on the default iface which causes problems
when the default iface is IPv6 only and the socket tries to connect to a
IPv4 address.
Bug: 12940882
Change-Id: I5b2bde0ac5459433fc5749f509072a548532f730
requestRouteToHost will only allow system applications to make routes
exempt from the VPN's routing rules.
If a VPN is currently running and a non-system app requests a route it
will only succeed if that host is currently covered by a VPN exempt
routing rule. Otherwise it will fail.
For example, if a VPN is running and the MMS network is brought online
those routes will be added as VPN exempt. If an application then tries
to request a route to a MMS endpoint it will succeed because the routes
already exist. If an application tries to request a route to a host
covered by the VPN the call will fail.
Bug: 12937545
Change-Id: If7bcec91bbb96c62c8fb69748c975847e6c00b6f
The calling package name will be used to check if an application is a
system application when deciding if a route should be exempt from VPN
routing rules.
Bug: 12937545
Change-Id: I2c09c875fe9bb9685871a0a801ddcbb32fc17405
This may mean that secondary networks have bad network settings,
but currently default settings are overriden by secondary nets
which seems worse.
bug:13211589
Change-Id: I08d56e618208781bf6b21a88663c2b8503a4f226
Do this both on input from apps (giving error) and between wifi and
ConnectivityService (ignoring bad data). This means removing all
addresses beyond the first and all routes but the first default and
the implied direct-connect routes.
We do this because the user can't monitor the others (no UI), their
support wasn't intended, they allow redirection of all traffic
without user knowledge and they allow circumvention of legacy VPNs.
This should not move forward from JB as it breaks IPv6 and K has
a more resilient VPN.
Bug:12663469
Change-Id: I0d92db7efc30a1bb3e5b8c6e5595bdb9793a16f2
Conflicts:
core/java/android/net/LinkProperties.java
services/java/com/android/server/WifiService.java
wifi/java/android/net/wifi/WifiStateMachine.java
Refactored the directory structure so that services can be optionally
excluded. This is step 1. Will be followed by another change that makes
it possible to remove services from the build.
Change-Id: Ideacedfd34b5e213217ad3ff4ebb21c4a8e73f85
This is necessary so that the framework can know whether an IPv6
address is likely to be usable (i.e., if it's global scope and
preferred). Also, it will simplify the address notification
methods in INetworkManagementEventObserver, which currently take
the address, the flags, and the scope as separate arguments.
1. Add flags and scope to the class and update the unit test.
Use the IFA_F_* and RT_SCOPE_* constants defined by libcore.
Since most callers don't know about flags and scope, provide
constructors that default the flags to zero and determine the
scope from the address. Addresses notified by the kernel will
have these properly set. Make multicast addresses invalid.
Update the class documentation.
2. Provide an isSameAddressAs() method that compares only the
address and prefix information between two LinkAddress
objects. This is necessary because an interface can't have
two addresses with the same address/prefix but different
flags.
3. Update LinkProperties's addLinkAddress and removeLinkAddress
to identify existing addresses to add/remove using
isSameAddressAs instead of implicit equals(). Specifically:
- If addLinkAddress is called with an address that is already
present, the existing address's flags and scope are updated.
This allows, for example, an address on an interface to go
from preferred to deprecated when it expires, without it
having to be removed and re-added.
- If removeLinkAddress is called with an address that is
present but with different flags, it deletes that address
instead of failing to find a match.
4. Update the INetworkManagementEventObserver address
notification methods to take just a LinkAddress instead of
LinkAddress, flags, and scope. While I'm at it, change the
order of the arguments for consistency with the other
functions in the interface.
Change-Id: Id8fe0f09a7e8f6bee1ea3b52102178b689a9336e
1. Simplify the parceling code. Since the InetAddress inside a
LinkAddress can never be null, we don't need to special-case
the case where it is.
2. Add / update method documentation.
3. Write a unit test.
Change-Id: Iba0a8cecc683d55d736419965e72ee33dd66dc22
Currently address{Updated,Removed} pass in the address as a
string such as "fe80::1/64". Use LinkAddresses instead, since
that's what it is.
This makes the code more robust in the unlikely case that netd
passes in an invalid string. In the future we can move flags and
scope into the LinkAddress itself and simplify the code further.
Bug: 9180552
Change-Id: I66599f9529cf421caa7676fdd0141bb110b8589e
These are sent if the device receives IPv6 Router Advertisements
with DNS server configuration options. Currently, nothing listens
to them; in a future change we will use them as IPv6 DNS servers.
[Cherry-pick of af70f6c614]
Bug: 9180552
Change-Id: I05000c0cd3867a68ab390102e8470b6912a9d3aa
Adding validation for Global Proxy setting before it is
being set.
Proxy is validated at the boot time also to make sure
the value set is valid.
Signed-off-by: Raj Mamadgi <rmamadgi@sta.samsung.com>
bug:11598568
Change-Id: Idff5ae81119d8143da096b5291ecbfbc5875cbd4
