Coverity scan detected that asserts were setting values, not checking them:
CID 53252: Side effect in assertion (ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT)
assignment_where_comparison_intended: Assignment item->b = i * 2
has a side effect. This code will work differently in a non-debug build.
Did you intend to use a comparison ("==") instead?
CID 53259: Side effect in assertion (ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT)
assignment_where_comparison_intended: Assignment item->a = i
has a side effect. This code will work differently in a non-debug build.
Did you intend to use a comparison ("==") instead?
CID 53260: Side effect in assertion (ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT)
assignment_where_comparison_intended: Assignment item->a = i
has a side effect. This code will work differently in a non-debug build.
Did you intend to use a comparison ("==") instead?
CID 53261: Side effect in assertion (ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT)
assignment_where_comparison_intended: Assignment item->b = i * 2
has a side effect. This code will work differently in a non-debug build.
Did you intend to use a comparison ("==") instead?
Fixing those to be == caused test_nt_list_insert to start failing as
part assumed append order, part assumed insert order, so it had to be
fixed to use consistent ordering.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
9.8 KiB
9.8 KiB